Talk:Emotional exhaustion
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This articel has hardly anything to do with the Dutch articel „overspandheid“. I would like to suggest to split these articels to prevent confusion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:A450:89E3:1:DA2:F7B:C41A:8AA2 (talk) 18:27, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 January 2021 and 14 April 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Psychology Says.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 20:31, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Lead improvements
[edit]The lead needs to summarize why it is important, beyond its connection to the now-popular usage as a phenomenological label. It may be helpful to undefensively suggest that it is not mere "pop-psych", that there is validity to the construct or even that it is an attempt to put some validity on a common experience. Also the relationship of the concept to the more-established and accepted notion of "stress" might be helpful, either in the lead or near the top of the article. I don't know that you need a definition section if there is not too much disagreement about definition. That location might be a good place to position EE relative to overlapping or otherwise related concepts (as you have with "burnout"). DCDuring 17:16, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Too many headings
[edit]Although I like structure, the visual effect is rough. I have a particular personal dislike for a heading immediately followed by a subheading, without 3 or more lines of text intervening. Whether you need more text or fewer headings I can't say at the moment. DCDuring 17:26, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Depersonalization / Dehumanization
[edit]These two words refer to two entirely unrelated concepts. Could this be clarified? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.193.199.154 (talk) 01:39, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Emotional exhaustion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070623000624/http://web.uni-frankfurt.de/fb05/psychologie/Abteil/ABO/forschung/emoarbeit_lit2_e.htm to http://web.uni-frankfurt.de/fb05/psychologie/Abteil/ABO/forschung/emoarbeit_lit2_e.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100215224016/http://www.ilir.uiuc.edu:80/rupp-papers/CropanzanoRuppByrneJAP2003.pdf to http://www.ilir.uiuc.edu/rupp-papers/CropanzanoRuppByrneJAP2003.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:49, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Very academic
[edit]This reads less like a wikipedia article and more like a academic paper.
Merge proposal
[edit]The new page on Emotional hangover seems like a synonym or subset of the broader topic of Emotional exhaustion, and would fit better to. It might also help the very academic concerns listed above to leaven the existing content here. Klbrain (talk) 13:32, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Per nom. IntentionallyDense (talk) 20:49, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support Definitely seems either basically synonymous or like a strict subset as said by nom (it feels largely like slang for the exact same thing). The presence of this new article which has effectively no way to differentiate itself will assuredly 1) result in a bunch of unnecessary and messy content duplication, 2) make it harder to edit emotional exhaustion because of the mental overhead of considering what very arbitrarily goes in emotional exhaustion versus hangover, 3) ensure that minimal oversight is given to emotional hangover in favor of working on emotional exhaustion, 4) splinter off some small amount of work from emotional exhaustion for no real reason, and 5) create an article which pulls mostly from the sort of pop psychology offered by online magazines who use this slang instead of the term 'emotional exhaustion'. 'Emotional hangover' in its current state already feels like an essay-ified distillation of 'emotional exhaustion'. TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 01:29, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- C-Class Physiology articles
- Mid-importance Physiology articles
- Physiology articles about neurophysiology
- WikiProject Physiology articles
- C-Class psychology articles
- Mid-importance psychology articles
- WikiProject Psychology articles
- C-Class Occupational Safety and Health articles
- Unknown-importance Occupational Safety and Health articles
- WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health articles