Talk:Emotional conflict

Emotional conflict

Douglas LaBier, in his book, is dealing mostly with emotional conflict in the career/job scenario while Emotional conflict can affect people anywhere. <Yoradler5 00:17, 4 March 2007 (UTC)>[reply]

I thought it would be helpful for people who might suffer pains sometimes associated with emotional conflict to read his book, I am not his agent and not interested in just making more money for him. I don't think that even he cares, he didn't want his picture on his own page when I wanted to add it and asked for permission to use <Yoradler5 00:43, 4 March 2007 (UTC)>[reply]

Thanks for your reply, I just read it. For people to benefit from Wikipedia they don't have to be brain surgeon and read all sorts of complicated data and research. I am sure that what happened to me is not unique to me but happens to many others who can understand what's on the page and might be able to benefit from the info. I am not a doctor, does that make my unpleasent experience with this problem not voluble. I added external links which do have a more professional writing on the subject. Some of the data for tension headache I learned from the tension headache page <Yoradler5 00:56, 4 March 2007 (UTC)>[reply]

Let me ask you, if one the links on the page takes you to The University Health Center page of the University of Georgia and you read the following there, is it not credited enough support of what's claimed on the page? "A tension headache is a head pain that results from muscle tightening (contraction) in the neck and head. The muscle contraction leads to a slight decrease in blood flow to the surrounding areas and an irritation of pain fibers in the skin, muscles, and blood vessel walls." .."The causes are unknown. Anxiety, depression, and emotional conflicts are often associated with tension headaches.." Is it possible to give a source to the "Triger" section of the article? And if not, should it be eliminated? If links in the article lead to information that reenforces the claimes in the article why can't the articles in them be given and/or considered as sources? Sincerely. <Yoradler5 04:07, 4 March 2007 (UTC)>[reply]

Forgot to ask you what is "OR" <<Yoradler5 04:11, 4 March 2007 (UTC)>[reply]

These are two very different subjects: a specific person and a type of conflict that any person might have to deal with. Though he has done much work with the conflict, he isn't the conflict; therefore, they should remain as seperate entities.

The article is accurate, but as yet it is quite underdeveloped. I don't know much about this subject, but I do I read it, and was left wanting more from it. I have for now also added depression to it, because besides tension headaches one's physiology may make him more prone to various forms of depression when dealing with emotional conflict. I also think this article should clarify more clearly that it speaking of the "inner emotional conflict... i.e. having conflicting feelings inside", rather than emotional conflict between two seperate parties.

I don't think it should. Douglas LaBier is a person, whereas E. C. is about a pschological condition.If Douglas LaBier was a psych. condition, I'd say yes, but he isn't... Wildpelt- Riverclan Warrior 19:57, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Extensive Rewrite Needed

THe entire article is presented as a series of quotes, or at least most of it. None of the citations given actually have a link, merely listing the location of the data within a book. Right now its totally inaccessible and a huge departure from normal styling on Wikipedia. We may have to take it all apart and start over to reduce these issues, since every statement is a word for word quoting.

The information itself is fine, but the presentation is all wrong. 74.132.249.206 (talk) 09:47, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]