Talk:Emma Pillsbury

Emma Pillsbury has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 12, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

Television: Glee Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Glee task force (assessed as High-importance).

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Season 2

Is there a reason why she hasn't been in the last 2 episodes? JDDJS (talk) 03:59, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes... 70.190.234.152 (talk) 09:24, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Spouse

FOR THE LAST TIME, CARL IS NOT EMMA'S SPOUSE. THEY GOT AN ANNULMENT. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.220.56.10 (talk) 19:46, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

For (I hope) the last time, Carl is said to have asked for an annulment, but there is no mention on the show as to whether the annulment has been granted. But this fact is irrelevant to Emma's Wikipedia listing: the infobox is supposed to reflect the entire run of the show, not just a present-day snapshot: they were married for several months, so Carl will forever be listed as her spouse. If she marries again, there will be two spouses listed. This is the same as the "significant others" heading: all the truly significant relationships are listed on the character pages. BlueMoonset (talk) 19:54, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Why was my edit deleted?

It was correct.--Johnny 42 (talk) 18:41, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Johnny, I don't see any edits on this article under your username. Which edit do you mean?

In case yours was under an IP changing Emma's marital status in the infobox, the rule for character articles is that spouses during the time of the show are listed regardless of marital status as of the most recent show, and that current status is not listed. The details should be included in the storylines and relationships sections. So whether Emma has gotten an annulment or not—and while we know Carl has asked for one, it has never been stated on the show whether it has been granted—Carl will always be listed as a spouse for this article, just like Ken Tanaka will always be listed as a significant other. And yes, this means people can have more than one spouse listed, as odd as that may seem. Hope this answers your question! BlueMoonset (talk) 19:12, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Character

How can this character still be considered to be on Glee when the actress has moved on to be a regular on a different television series? Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:36, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Liz, because she appeared two weeks ago in a new episode, and it is always possible she will appear again in the future—she has already filmed episodes in the current season while being a regular on The Millers. Besides, the character will always have been on Glee—those episodes exist, even if it turns out that there are no appearances. It's like the infobox, which lists both Carl and Will as spouses: she was married to both of the characters at different points during the show's run. Character articles don't disappear when a character is written off of a program, any more than they disappear when the program itself ends. They still exist on DVDs and on-demand video, it's just that they cease to change. Even then, subsequent critical commentary can shed new light on characterization or reception, so the article could continue to grow. BlueMoonset (talk) 22:29, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much for the information, BlueMoonset, you answered my question. Since it has moved to Thursday nights, I don't regularly watch the program any more. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:36, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Emma Pillsbury. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101021222248/http://www.chartstats.com:80/artistinfo.php?id=12473 to http://www.chartstats.com/artistinfo.php?id=12473
Corrected formatting/usage for http://en-ca.nielsen.com/content/dam/nielsen/en_ca/documents/pdf/newsletters/billboard_canadian-update/Nielsen%20Music%20Canadian%20Update.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:59, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Emma Pillsbury. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:51, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Emma Pillsbury. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091213115148/http://blog.zap2it.com/ithappenedlastnight/2009/12/glee-dont-rain-on-my-parade-and-you-cant-always-get-what-you-want-rock-the-glee-finale.html to http://blog.zap2it.com/ithappenedlastnight/2009/12/glee-dont-rain-on-my-parade-and-you-cant-always-get-what-you-want-rock-the-glee-finale.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:15, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]