This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Emir Suljagić is part of the WikiProject Bosnia and Herzegovina, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Bosnia and Herzegovina on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Bosnia and HerzegovinaWikipedia:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaTemplate:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaBosnia and Herzegovina articles
Fellow editor @Alach_E has repeatedly deleted a sourced section detailing controversies surrounding this public figure. They are sourced from Bosnian media outlets (unfortunately not in English). He has once again deleted them and then, absurdly, blamed me for an edit war. Perhaps one way to avoid an edit war is to not delete this sourced information, which is widely known in B&H!
Unfortunately for Suljagić and other ill-behaved men, gender-based violence is a matter of public concern for a politician and public figure. I am therefore restoring the edits, while the PR department of this article attempts to “reach a consensus” about whether violence against women reaches Wikipedia’s grand standards. Unsignedunmastered (talk) 17:23, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I noticed that the editor @WikiDan61 (perhaps an alt of Alach’s?) claims that Informer.ba is a non-neutral source. Indeed, it is morally taxing to remain neutral about violence against women! Unsignedunmastered (talk) 17:26, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Unsignedunmastered: Please be careful throwing around accusations of sockpuppetry. If you look at my user contributions, you will see that I am a long-time and well-respected editor at Wikipedia. And while it is, indeed, taxing to remain neutral about an issue such as violence against women, it is the job of respected journalists to do just that, and report a story without the hint that they are favoring one side or the other. The story at Insider.ba clearly takes Suljagić's wife's side even before any court of law has had a chance to adjudicate the matter. Accusations of spousal abuse are serious, and should be taken seriously by the courts that adjudicate them. Only after that process has concluded should we include the matter here, should Suljagić be found guilty in the matter. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!!18:18, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies for the accusation, your edit and Alach E's post on my talk page occurred very close to each other; but perhaps that is the wheels of the PR department turning.
