Jump to content

Talk:Emily Procter

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Emily proctor was in a toothpaste commercial, wasn't she? PrometheusX303 00:40, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Removed the phrase "I'm better than you" from the description of her role in CSI:Miami. 64.81.139.191

I believe Emily is also fronts an 80's cover band called "White Lighten". I was able to confirm the bit about being in the band on her personal site, and the bit about the name I was able to confirm on her IMDB bio
-- 07:15, 23 December 2006 (UTC)GuiGuru

Anyone else think those links to the so-called TeeVee awards should be removed? They're not actually awards at all, and just seem to be the ramblings of some people who run a website who happen to not like her acting.

Image

[edit]

I'm pretty sure this image cannot be used here. It's a screenshot from a show which is considered fair use for a West Wing article, or even the character played by Procter. But not in the article about Procter herself. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.231.58.143 (talk) 08:51, August 29, 2007 (UTC)

Why? The image is of Emily Procter. Why is fair use not OK in this article? Has WP image policy changed recently, or was it always this way? Kasreyn 17:08, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I just had a look through Wikipedia:Non-free content, which unless I'm mistaken is the current guiding policy on when it's OK to use "fair use" non-free content. It lists 10 criteria for acceptance, and I can't see how this image fails any of them. Kasreyn 17:15, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Images of living persons must be of free use unless they cannot be obtained (if they are deceased). Fair use images are not allowed for living persons when they can be replaced with a free use one. This is why it was removed. Ejfetters 03:05, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Do you know what the reasoning is behind the tougher standard? Kasreyn 04:49, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • Policy is if the image can be replaced with a free-use image then it should be done so. Actor is living, and a free use image is obtainable. Very notable celebrities with countless publicity photographs, if you look, don't have these, they have free use images, maybe found at awards shows, concerts, etc. See images for deletion and you can see numerous images have been deleted for this reason also. Ejfetters 05:34, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    I replaced the current "no picture" image with the publicity picture of Emily as Ainsley Hayes used from Ainsley's page. I'm pretty sure it doesn't violate policy, and it's definitely fair use. Capreolus 21:07, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • Publicity phots aren't allowed, look at every other celebrity page, they are free use images. This must be free use if free use is obtainable. This image also is in violation. Ejfetters 04:17, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Grab your camera boys, we're going to Hollywood. We'll get that Emily Procter picture yet. Its been a year in the making! --IronMaidenRocks (talk) 04:36, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Emily Procter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:45, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Year of birth

[edit]

I have changed the year of birth to 1971, based on the cited source The Southern Belle Of 'CSI'. I don't know where 1968 (previously shown as her year of birth) originated. The cited article is dated February 11, 2009. Its last two paragraphs say:

"Holy cow!" Procter exclaimed. "My birthday is next week (Oct. 8), and I feel like (the cake) is mine, so I'm 100." Actually, she'll be 38.

If she turned 38 on October 8, 2009, that indicates that she was born on October 8, 1971.

If anyone has documentation to support 1968 as her birth year, feel free to provide it. Eddie Blick (talk) 16:36, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Every other source I find on the Internet lists her birthdate as 1968. Here's a UPI story from this year, listing her age as 53 and birthyear as 1968:

Also, if you look, while the date in the article text says 2009, the URL clearly states it as being from 2006.

Which would also be congruent with a 1968 birthdate.

It's likely the article text was updated at some point in 2009, which caused the inline date to change, but it's not the date of the event, and the citation is therefore almost certainly correct.Autographedcat (talk) 19:54, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Emily_Procter&oldid=1209879659"