Talk:Emily Litella

Merge discussion

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was Merge.

It has been suggested quite some time ago that Never mind (Saturday Night Live) be merged into this article. Any comments?
— ^.`^) Paine Ellsworth ^diss`cuss (^^`. 18:35, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge: It obviously should be merged to this article. It is enough (at least) to have an article devoted to a recurring bit that is part one sketch (Weekend Update) on a TV series. Having an article devoted to the two-word punchline of that bit is too much even by Wikipedia's standards. (Please don't tell me that there is an article on "Excuse me, Ms. Litella".) Merger would have the side-benefit of adding two badly needed sources to this unsourced, albeit accurate, article. —Finell (Talk) 03:35, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge. They should be merged.75.70.244.88 (talk) 04:45, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge. The merge of article Never mind (Saturday Night Live) to Emily Litella was completed this date. – PAINE ELLSWORTH ^CLIMAX! 17:44, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Deprodding

A quick search of Google Books shows many books that discuss the character, including , Saturday Night: A Backstage History of Saturday Night Live, I'm Chevy Chase ... and You're Not, and The Miracle of Language, which called the character "Next to Archie Bunker, the most eminent modern mangler of the English vocabulary". Given multiple reliable sources found in a one minute search, non-notability is controversial. Hence, deprod. --Mark viking (talk) 19:32, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It was quite well-known in the second half of the 1970s in the U.S. (almost as much as "Francisco Franco is still dead" or "Jane, you ignorant slut"). AnonMoos (talk) 22:34, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I pretty much reference this character everytime I want to say "never mind" after any post ([1]). Time to add some IRS.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:52, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding the new prose and sources. --Mark viking (talk) 01:18, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Emily Litella. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080706175443/http://www.usnews.com/blogs/barone/2005/9/28/at-nasa-an-emily-litella-moment.html to http://www.usnews.com/blogs/barone/2005/9/28/at-nasa-an-emily-litella-moment.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:36, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Missing Appearance(s)?

The table has 22 dates when there are 26 appearances mentioned in the Premise section. There are more than 26 malapropisms listed so it can't be that. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0uIWLm7GQDM - (Nothing) does not appear to be in the table. In the absence of definitive RS, I've tagged the list as incomplete ^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 15:38, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]