Talk:Emeco 1006/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: LavaBaron (talk · contribs) 05:51, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

1. Is the article well-written?

The paragraph about movies and media seems out of place for a section labeled "description." I feel this should be under "history" or in a separate "in pop culture" section.

Done I prefer it where it is, but I'd rather move it to History (where its transition to a designer chair is discussed) than a separate pop culture section. IMO, dedicated pop culture sections tend to turn into indiscriminate lists of every movie it's briefly featured in. CorporateM (Talk) 06:14, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The second sentence of the third paragraph under "Description" places a period outside, rather than inside, quotations even though this article is otherwise composed using American spelling. WP:ARTCON

Done CorporateM (Talk) 06:07, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2. Is the article verifiable with no original research?

I could not find, in the sources, that the "Emeco 1006 chair is featured regularly in design magazines and movies." I could find that it had been featured in magazines and movies but it appears OR to conclude, on this basis, it is regularly featured. Note - please correct me if it actually does say that; there were several very long sources and I may have just missed it.

Citation 4 says "The chairs frequently are featured in style magazines and turn up in popular movies and television shows." The full article is available in HighBeam or Proquest. Unfortunately, as is often the case, many of the sources are not readily available online. I can provide the full text by email if preferred though. CorporateM (Talk) 06:12, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

3. Is the article broad in its coverage?
4. Is the article neutral?
5. Is the article stable?
6. Is the article illustrated?