Jump to content

Talk:Emblem of Hong Kong

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Rename the article?

[edit]

Maybe I'm just pedantic, but I'm not really comfortable with calling HK's current emblem a coat of arms, since it's not actually an armorial bearing per se. I'm inclined to rename the article Emblem of Hong Kong or Regional Emblem of Hong Kong. That way, it'll encompass all of Hong Kong's emblems, past and present. It'll also be consistent with the names of other articles (eg. Flag of Hong Kong, Emblem of the People's Republic of China, and most other articles under Category: National Coats of Arms). Thoughts? - Hinto 23:38, 20 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support. Hong Kong does not use Coats of Arms as [1], it is referred as Regional Embelm. Renaming the article will make the name more accurate and consistent. --Hurricane111 16:14, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Was the colonial one called coat of arm? "Emblem of Hong Kong" would be a better name since this article talks about the colonial one, and strictly speaking Hong Kong before 1997 was a dependent territory, and earlier a crown colony, instead of a region. — Instantnood 16:36, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • (I moved to more consistent naming with others countries, has nothing to do with the suggested rename above.) maybe split? "Emblem of ..." _and_ "CoA of ..." Or use a neutral name. Is there a name for both? Category:National coats of arms allready has some "Emblem of ...". IMO this is not very correct. Could emblem comprise CoA? Tobias Conradi (Talk) 09:06, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • How can the emblem really "replace" the coat of arms since it's an emblem and not a coat of arms? Is there any legislation or action removing the coat of arms? --Daniel C. Boyer 14:51, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    • The emblem is used in place of the coat of arms since the transfer of sovereignty. They are basically serving the same purposes. — Instantnood 15:25, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
      • The lack of use of a coat of arms has no bearing whatsoever on its being the arms of Hong Kong. That the emblem is used in places where the arms were or would have been has no bearing on the question either. Coats of arms may not be used by any member of a family or entity for many centuries, even, but that does not impair the right to bear them. Barring a specific enactment abolishing the coat of arms as such, I'd argue they are still the arms of Hong Kong. --Daniel C. Boyer 17:31, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. The Emblem is not the armorial bearings. It replaced the armorial bearings used before 1997. The best option is to have two linked articles - "Hong Kong Emblem" and "Hong Kong Armorial Bearings. Anyway "Coat of Arms" is both ugly and technically incorrect - Armorial Bearings (NOT Armorial Bearing) is correct; so ALL "Coats of Arms" should be altered! This is not pedantic - since the correct terms should always be used. Likewise a "Crest" is the thing on top of the helmet NOT the shield from the armorial bearings! Also an emblem can easily be replaced by Armorial Bearings, and visa versa - at the order of the ruling authority at the time! Skull 'n' Femurs 15:14, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

The image File:Colonial BadgeBlack.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --16:26, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Emblem of Hong Kong. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:24, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:10, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:54, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Emblem_of_Hong_Kong&oldid=1201742633"