Talk:Emausaurus
Appearance
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stegosaur?
[edit]Emausaurus is a stegosaur? Wasn't it a scelidosaurid? Jerkov 16:56, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
- While it was similar to Scelidosaurus, studies show it was slgihtly closer to stegosaurs. since Stegosauria is defined to include any animal more stegosaur-like than ankylosaur-like, and Emausaurus is *slightly* more steg-like than anky-like, it's technically a stegosaur. It was NOT a member of the family Stegosauridae, though, and I changed that in the article.Dinoguy2 17:22, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
- What analysis recovered Stegosaurus and Emausaurus as closer to each other than Ankylosaurus? AFAIK, Stegosaurus and Ankylosaurus have been recovered as closer to each other than Emausaurus. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.245.160.85 (talk) 17:56, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
- That was a blast from the past. I think it came from something George Olshevsky said on the Dinosaur Mailing List years ago. J. Spencer (talk) 01:08, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you for editing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.245.160.75 (talk) 20:51, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
- That was a blast from the past. I think it came from something George Olshevsky said on the Dinosaur Mailing List years ago. J. Spencer (talk) 01:08, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
- What analysis recovered Stegosaurus and Emausaurus as closer to each other than Ankylosaurus? AFAIK, Stegosaurus and Ankylosaurus have been recovered as closer to each other than Emausaurus. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.245.160.85 (talk) 17:56, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:07, 6 June 2020 (UTC)