Talk:Emagic

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Emagic article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Apple Inc. Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apple Inc., a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Apple, Mac, iOS and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Apple Inc.Wikipedia:WikiProject Apple Inc.Template:WikiProject Apple Inc.Apple Inc. articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

This is really strange. I added a link to a large Emagic user forum here a couple of days ago, and it got reverted, and was marked as a linkspam. Can somebody tell me why? Take a look at this forum: http://www.nabble.com/Emagic-f2878.html - it aggregates the user discussions on Emagic into a single searchable forum, you can post questions and find answers there, it's a highly relevant resource for the emagic users. why is this not good for this page? If this is a mistake, please add back the link to the page.

--Audiolo 22:18, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It should also be mentioned that Emagic produced some hardware units of significant merit. Their MIDI interfaces were both comon and extremely stable, the Unitor-8 variants particularly popular.

81.111.125.222 (talk) 01:39, 23 February 2013 (UTC) Merrlyn, 23-02-2013[reply]

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.111.125.222 (talk) 01:37, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]