Talk:Ely railway station

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).

This article lacks references.

Trains bypassing Ely station?

On the National Rail map, there appears to be a direct link between the lines to Peterborough and Norwich, bypassing Ely station. This link exists physically, as you can see on this map: there is a loop allowing trains to run directly from Peterborough to Norwich (or Kings Lynn) without reversing. But does any passenger train ever use this loop? The National Rail map does not usually include freight lines with no passenger service. Mtford 03:41, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

~~:According to various timetables for passenger trains, no. Simply south 10:24, 11 October 2007 (UTC)~~[reply]

One timetable shows the 15:53 from Norwich Central Trains service to Peterborough and beyond on a Sunday, which is very fast but does NOT call at Ely. No others so 1 train per day from Norwich to Peterborough and beyond only, and not te other way. Simply south 10:43, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above train (15:53 on Sundays) is now operated by East Midland Trains. According to the timetable this service does not stop at Ely. Presumably, therefore, it uses the link mentioned above (since otherwise the service would somehow need to change direction - as indeed other services on the Norwich to Peterborough route do by leaving Ely station in the same direction from which they entered). It appears, therefore, that there is at least one service per week which uses this link. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.31.205.235 (talk) 00:07, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ely railway station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:55, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Historical Services

Hi all, I have noticed that this article contains a section on historical services, which I haven't seen on any other station pages. I'm wondering what people think about whether it should be kept in the article or perhaps reduced to a concise snapshot, as it is rather a hefty lump of text positioned rather awkwardly before a lot of the useful content surrounding services and layout etc.

--Pintodog (talk) 22:24, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]