Talk:Elvis Country (I'm 10,000 Years Old)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elvis Presley, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Elvis PresleyWikipedia:WikiProject Elvis PresleyTemplate:WikiProject Elvis PresleyElvis Presley articles

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Country music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Country music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to country music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Country musicWikipedia:WikiProject Country musicTemplate:WikiProject Country musicCountry music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I always wonder what Elvis could have done if "The Colonel" would have allowed him to become the actor he wanted to be. I have a feeling he could have been a very good actor, maybe even great. I recall the scene in "Jailhouse Rock", where he grabs the girl, and plants one on her, and she snarls at him about his thinking such "Cheap tactics would work with me!" And he says, "Ain't tactics, honey...it's just the beast in me..." He had good instincts, good reaction, and acting is mostly reacting. --Algoma.

Ok.

Intro Needs Rewording

Hi! The first sentence as it stands is extremely confusing:

"Elvis Country (I'm 10,000 Years Old) was Elvis Presley's second studio album to be released in the 1970's (the first being That's The Way It Is), which was slated as a live album"

This definitely needs rewording by someone more familiar with Elvis than myself.--80.193.22.182 15:21, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've also had to reword it to remove a factual error as it was changed to read that this album was Elvis' 24th LP, not counting soundtracks, and that's clearly incorrect. Up to this point Presley had only recorded about a dozen studio albums, with the rest being soundtracks. 68.146.41.232 (talk) 15:54, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Legacy edition comments

I'm probably going to delete the statement about fans being critical of the Legacy edition. For one thing, no source is provided for the statement, suggesting a WP:NPOV violation, and the statement is also factually incorrect considering both Elvis Country and Love Letters were, except for three tracks, recorded at the same June 1970 session. I've place a citation tag and if no one adds to it I'll take the comments out. 68.146.52.234 (talk) 17:07, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Elvis Country (I'm 10,000 Years Old). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101108074213/http://www.elvis.com/about-the-king/music/billboard_top_20_charts/pop_albums.aspx to http://www.elvis.com/about-the-king/music/billboard_top_20_charts/pop_albums.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:45, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]