This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
FYI, now there are articles on Sarah Kennedy, Deborah Owen, Jennifer Jenkins and Caroline Thorpe, and none are dealing with wives of Liberal leaders. That means IMHO that being the wife of a politician does not make one notable by itself. Maarten1963 (talk) 14:16, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This page should be deleted. Read every sentence about this person and all you will see is info on where they were born, where they lived, went to school, and who they married. This person has not done anything notable to deserve to have an encyclopedia page of her own. If this becomes the standard on Wikipedia, then anyone who has ever married any person of minor notability can claim to have the right to have their own encyclopedia page. NoWikiNoLife21:30, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Kinda depends on who attended the parties, or what was served, or if the early Beatles performed maybe? I concur this article fails the notability test. Is seems ANYONE and I mean ANYONE lately is entitled to have their bio on WP. Just about every criminal who makes it into a newspaper article gets a page, for example. 2600:6C48:7006:200:5C10:C716:750B:C3B2 (talk) 01:50, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]