Talk:Ellis Act

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

California

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Stub

I created this stub. Please give it time for others to find it and grow it. Please no speedy deletion. --Treekids (talk) 02:29, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I reworked a lot of the introduction and the information about the Ellis Act in San Francisco. Much of what was posted was simply inaccurate. I included references to specific examples of the application of the Ellis Act in San Francisco and explained generally how the Ellis Act is implemented by local governments. Jag149 (talk) 00:47, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think that the information presented in this article was very neutral. It clearly stated facts and defined what the Ellis Act was and how it plays an important role within the housing sectors in California. I think that something that could be improved upon is the details of the acts as applications of the law in Santa Monica and San Francisco. Greater detail of the effects of the Ellis Act would give more information on why it was implemented and what it has done for the state. Marissa18 wong (talk) 06:50, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ellis Act. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101201175705/http://tenantstogether.org/article.php?id=1043 to http://www.tenantstogether.org/article.php?id=1043
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.sfgov2.org/ftp/uploadedfiles/elections/ElectionsArchives/Meeting_Information/BSC/agendas/2014/November/11-A

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:38, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]