Talk:Ellie Goulding/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Azealia911 (talk · contribs) 15:10, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Azealia911 and I'll be reviewing this good article nomination. Azealia911 talk 15:10, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) The GA nominator has made zero edits to the article. sst✈ (top/bottom) 15:49, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, but anyone can nominate an article for GA if they think it meets the criteria. Azealia911 talk 15:57, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
- I know, but it's something to remember when performing the review. sst✈ 05:16, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, but anyone can nominate an article for GA if they think it meets the criteria. Azealia911 talk 15:57, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
- I'm very sorry that this is taking so long to get to. My outside world workload has unexpectedly increased substantially, so I'm just trying to balance things out temporarily. My aim is to get to this by the start of next week. Thankyou for baring with me! Azealia911 talk 10:54, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
- My greatest apologies that this has taken so long to come to. I'm even more sorry that people may have waited all this time considering this is being issued with an immediate fail on the basis of it being very far off GA condition. There are content issues, with sections such as 'Awards and nominations' including nothing but a link to the relevant article, with no summary of her lifetime achievements. Her filmography and tours sections contain no citations, and elsewhere in the article, there are many, many unreliable sources evoked (Twitter, Facebook, and other social media posts are satisfactory citations when none others are available, but having primary sources in a GA isn't the perfect scenario). I'm also seeing a tonne of unsourced statements, from her personal life to her musical releases. I can now see why it was pointed out to me that the GA nominator had not edited this page at all, as it seems there was little to no preparation for this review. The article isn't bad, but it's not ready to be considered for GA at this time I'm afraid. Azealia911 talk 20:49, 31 January 2016 (UTC)