Talk:Ellesmere Chaucer

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Poetry Low‑importance

	Poetry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Link out of date

The link to the Ellesmere Manuscript at the bottom of this page is out of date. I thought I should let everyone know 24.108.189.244 02:45, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Surely the title of this article is wrong? The facsimiles (published 1911 and 1995) as well as the official Huntington Library description (1989) of the MS all call it the "Ellesmere Chaucer". When it is referred to as 'the Ellesmere manuscript' is is usually part of a longer name: "The Ellesmere Manuscript of the Canterbury Tales". The Huntington Library has many Ellesmere manuscripts, not just this one, so surely it is wrong and/or misleading to refer to it as *the* Ellesmere MS? —Preceding unsigned comment added by PeterKidd (talk • contribs) 17:19, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect that within Chaucerian scholarship it is usually known as the Ellesmere manuscript, and in wider contexts as the "Ellesmere Chaucer". but a move may well be justified. I've moved it, as both working refs, including the Library, use this name. Johnbod (talk) 19:56, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Ellesmere Chaucer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080905221803/http://www.umainetoday.umaine.edu/issues/v4i5/adam.html to http://www.umainetoday.umaine.edu/Issues/v4i5/adam.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:50, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ellesmere Chaucer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090108005459/http://www.liu.edu/cwis/CWP/library/sc/chaucer/text_page.htm to http://www2.liu.edu/cwis/cwp/library/sc/chaucer/text_page.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:56, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]