Talk:Ellemann-Jensen doctrine

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Denmark Low‑importance

	Denmark portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

On 5 July 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from Ellemann–Jensen doctrine to Ellemann-Jensen doctrine. The result of the discussion was moved.

[Untitled]

Footnote policy The article states that the so-called footnote policy was a phenomenon of the 1970s, and a result of the Social Democratic views on military intervention. To the best of my knowledge, the footnote policy was the the outcome of the Schlüter governments in the 1980s consisting of a coalition of a number of parties, amongst others the Radikale Venstre. While the Radikale did support Danish NATO membership, they did not condone what they viewed as military aggression from NATO, and therefor they would not allow the Danish foreign minister to back such acts up in NATO. This then led to such NATO acts to be equipped with footnotes, that stated that Denmark did not support this particular act.

Amazingly enough, I can not be bothered with looking up sources for my own understanding, or the one given in the article. Therefor i will only change the article if you guys agree with my understanding (or even better - provide sources that back it up). Harald ss (talk) 19:19, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 5 July 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Speedy close; uncontroversial technical move. Favonian (talk) 12:07, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ellemann–Jensen doctrine → Ellemann-Jensen doctrine – undo 2009 page move to erroneous en-dash version because Uffe Ellemann-Jensen is one person with a hyphenated name, not two people. Turtlecrown (talk) 19:42, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.