Talk:Elk*rtuk

Hungary Low‑importance

	Hungary portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hungary, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hungary on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HungaryWikipedia:WikiProject HungaryTemplate:WikiProject HungaryHungary articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Reviewer Note

This article was declined by two AFC reviewers and then moved to article space by the originator. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:20, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Links are supposed to be present to both reviews on this talk page. ᴳᴿᴲᴳᴼᴿᴵᴷ☺ᶤᶯᵈᶸᶩᶢᵉ 09:19, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Couple of things:

1.) The original creator of the draft was someone without a Wikipedia account, only identified via their IPv6 address. The draft was moved to article space by Norden1990.

2.) Although I did contribute the vast majority of the article's content, I was neither the originator, nor did I have a hand in moving this article to article space. In fact, that took place while I was writing a new section for the draft and resulted in having to resolve conflicts between the two edits.

3.) Robert is right in that the article has been declined by AFC reviewers twice, once by KylieTastic on 5th October, 2021, here, and another time by Eternal Shadow on the 14th, here. I would argue the article is in a vastly different condition than it was when it was declined, although if another review is deemed warranted, I would wholeheartedly support it. I admittedly have a skewed view when it comes to the movie's importance (I see dozens of posters promoting this movie on my daily commute, and have come across articles and controversies about it daily, so I may feel like it's more important than it really is on a global scale), and am inexperienced when it comes to editing, so an objective review of whether the article meets W:NFILM may be in order. --HamukaKong (talk) 20:48, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]