Talk:Elizabeth Riley

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 19 March 2019 by reviewer HitroMilanese (talk · contribs).

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Caprial's peer review

technical stuff

Add a comma after "afterwards" in the lead
For her children's names, you can list them as "Sarah and Ann Jackson" and "William Jr., George, and Eliza".
Add a citation after "apparently unable to write"

content stuff

Good chronology, clear lead
I think the "abolitionism" section could be renamed as "activism" as some of Riley's work was not strictly concerned with Abolition and was more community/church/charity oriented. Abolition could be a subheading with Riley's involvement in the anti-slavery societies.

Lacroixluvr99 (talk) 23:01, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Prof. Smith feedback:

Hi Benjamin,

I think you have an excellent start to your article and your revisions will be pretty easy to complete. You have done a lot of high-quality research here and, as always, your writing is strong and clear. Here are the revisions I would make: - Eliminate the "Trivia" section. There are some interesting facts here, but I worry that Wikipedia editors will take the article less seriously if it has a section of random and fairly unimportant facts like this. - I think that you're burying the lede in this story. Riley's primary significance, historically, is her involvement with the Minkins case. This is one of the four or five most famous and controversial fugitive slave episodes in US history. I would mention her critical role in your article lead (to establish notability right off the bat) and I would also put the Minkins case first under "Activism" rather than burying it down below a lot less important information about her alleged theft(which is bordering on being trivial). In other words, I would hit the Minkins case harder and earlier in the article and perhaps even give more detail about it if you can. — Preceding unsigned comment added by StaceySmithOSU (talk • contribs) 01:04, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]