This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greater Manchester, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greater Manchester on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Greater ManchesterWikipedia:WikiProject Greater ManchesterTemplate:WikiProject Greater ManchesterGreater Manchester articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles about women in business on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject Women in BusinessTemplate:WikiProject Women in BusinessWomen in Business articles
Not sure what is going on but note b has a format error, displaying 2,019 when it should be 2019. I see that it is generated by {{CURRENTYEAR}}, which is not something with which I am familiar. Nice article, by the way. - Sitush (talk) 20:45, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Sitush. I've seen the formatting (which shouldn't be happening, as it's in that template), and left a note on the template talk page, but no response so far... Cheers - SchroCat (talk) 21:48, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This term, which I have rarely heard in noun form outside the context of venture capital, is used in the lede and short description but nowhere else in the article. It may help to explain this a bit more. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 18:22, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
OED: "One who innovates; an introducer of novelties or new methods" - I don't think there is much doubt that this description of Raffald is substantiated in the main text. Tim riley talk22:18, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm 99% certain that this is of a reprint from the nineteenth century. The history of printing is an interest of mine: this book seems to be printed in a nineteenth-century typeface, Miller & Richard's Old Style, very popular for upmarket printing in the second half of the nineteenth century. In addition, the paper and printing quality look very good by eighteenth century standards, although not impossible. Compare it with the surrounding images, which do look normal for the eighteenth century, and there's a striking difference, although they are of worse-quality scans to be fair. According to Abe Books there was a reprint of this book in 1889, and although I can't find images of the inside I think that's likely what we're looking at here. Blythwood (talk) 21:33, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Added this to the article text (edit: put back). With more examination I've become very certain of this. If you compare with real 1772 books on Wikimedia Commons, e.g. this one, (but feel free to pick out any one at random) the difference in the finish of the paper and presswork is extremely stark. Blythwood (talk) 03:31, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your comments are interesting, but it's WP:OR, I'm afraid. We go with what the reputable sources, not with what you think you may have worked out. As a compromise, I've removed the date from the IB image - it's of lesser importance than the image itself. The editor formally known as SchroCat, editing from 2A00:23C7:2B86:9801:6562:A1FC:F7F2:51BF (talk) 18:52, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=small}