Jump to content

Talk:Elizabeth Gould (psychologist)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

style

[edit]

The article is nice to read, but not encyclopaedic. It reads at some places like a eulogy to Elizabeth Gould (e.g. "she works for many hours and expects the same from her co-workers") and further it is not necessary to mention her academic title in every sentence (WP:NAMES). Ben T/C 14:09, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]


x2 exactly right criticism.

seriously, wtf at the breathless praise? sounds like a starry-eyed undergrad wrote it.71.103.149.123 (talk) 05:37, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Focus On Findings!

Elizabeth Gould is a pioneer in the field of neurogenesis and was one of the first researchers to establish that neurons in the adult brain can divide. Elizabeth Gould broke a major existing paradigm. There should be more focus on the impact of the findings and less of a story telling.

129.109.65.168 (talk) 19:49, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Citations!!!!! So many factual statements in this article that are totally unsupported by citations Ileanadu (talk) 04:34, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

sources

[edit]

There are very few references —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.36.150.134 (talk) 21:59, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cross-posting with my comments to Pasco Rakic article

[edit]

This article states that Pasco Rakic's assertion that there is no neurogenesis in the adult brain was the accepted scientific position for a significant period of time but in the Pasco Rakic article there is no support for this statement.

I am posting a link to my comments on the talk page of that article regarding the discrepancy:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Pasko_Rakic#Work_in_Neurogenesis 04:59, 22 September 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ileanadu (talkcontribs)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Elizabeth Gould (psychologist). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:42, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Elizabeth Gould (psychologist). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:56, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]