Jump to content

Talk:Elizabeth Gillies

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

club

[edit]

I'm so sorry Angelina Calbone. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.191.109.122 (talk) 22:01, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Elizabeth Gillies Twitter

[edit]

Elizabeth's twitter account is @lizgillies.

Vampire Suck

[edit]

Is she really in it? I can't find any sources confirming it, not even the IMDb. As it stands, we just have to take Wikipedia's word for it. --Kage Me (talk) 11:19, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No she isnt. —Preceding unsigned comment added by PercyLogan! (talkcontribs) 01:02, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Picture request

[edit]

I think it's really bad that we don't have an image of her. But thats easier said than done. The only pictures I found was these one on Flickr [1], sadly they aren't free to use it here on wikipedia. Could anyone help me to find and upload a picture of Elizabeth Gillies? --Simon.hess (talk) 13:51, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I found one of her and put in on Wikipedia Commons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Awesome444a444 (talkcontribs) 19:43, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help. But, sadly the picture which you uploaded isn't free to use it on wikipedia. --Simon.hess (talk) 18:12, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So we are allowed to spell her middle name but not Ariana Grandes

[edit]

There's no reference that her middle name is Egan.69.137.229.200 (talk) 17:53, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, there was one in the infobox. I've duplicated it to show in the main text. —C.Fred (talk) 19:52, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Liz Gillies going down.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Liz Gillies going down.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Liz Gillies going down.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:48, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please modify

[edit]

the page

Phd8511 (talk) 15:46, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image

[edit]

Why was the image removed? Phd8511 (talk) 14:52, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Look in the edit history for July 16. The person who removed it didn't like it and thought no picture was better than the only free-use one we have. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:11, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Silly Phd8511 (talk) 14:57, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that no infobox picture is better than a bad infobox picture. But I guess I'm in the minority. Really, I think it's a rule on this site for attractive actresses to have bad infobox pictures that do them no justice. When I look up an actress on Wikipedia, 9 times out of 10 they have a bad image. Is it just a coincidence that the only images that can be used on this site are bad? Or is the person in charge of that a jealous, unattractive woman? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.132.39.126 (talk) 21:37, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This Google search for this show that excludes mentions of Gillies, Trainor and Lawrence finds nothing about a TV show of that name other than a delete discussion at the NL wiki. I doubt this show ever existed but somehow got attached to Gillies and Trainor as either misinformation or a web hoax. IMDb does not list this show and they are pretty good at info on old shows. I removed mention of this show from this article and Jerry Trainor's article. No mention was in the Mr. Lawrence article. I would like to see some proof of existence outside of web articles on Gillies and Trainor before considering this a valid credit for any person. Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:55, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Elizabeth Gillies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:41, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Revert last edit?

[edit]

Someone should revert the last edit made by Skylarblue112256. I'd do it, but I'm on my phone and I can't find that option on mobile. ~~---- Hiway202 (talk) 04:51, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Elizabeth's marriage

[edit]

I don't think She is married to Michael Corcoran in this year. Someone edited this. Steve Stylish (talk) 06:34, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's what the Vogue source says. --IJBall (contribstalk) 12:26, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]