Talk:Elizabeth Fones

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Massachusetts Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Massachusetts portal This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts.

Sources

A historical novel is not a reliable source for a bio due to it being fictional. BigDunc^Talk 14:53, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I found another source which I listed:John J Latting's paper on the New York Genealogical and Biographical Record, 1880. Besides, Anya Seton's novel "Winthrop Woman" is often referred to as a reliable source, seeing as she wrote the book based entirely on fact, drawn from documented references which she listed at the end of the book. Also the wikipedia article on History of Greenwich, Connecticut, mentions Elizabeth and Robert Feake.jeanne (talk) 15:25, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ten years later, I agree that Seton's historical fiction is not appropriate for use as a source in this article. I have removed its one instance in the article and added a citation needed tag. The information (largely about Winthrop's husband) should be removed if it doesn't exist in any sources named by Seton or available elsewhere.--DiamondRemley39 (talk) 15:52, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DOD only probable

A contributor at WeRelate, on Elizabeth Fones (5), offers the following:

"Shows death in 1673 without citation, possibly taken from Cocks, George William. History and Genealogy of the Cock, Cocks, Cox Family, which cited a court document dated 26 Apr 1674 found in State Historian's Report, p. 2:182, to say, "it may be assumed that Bess Hallett had deceased some time in the year 1673 at Newton, L.I."" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jrm03063 (talk • contribs) 14:51, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

American Ancestors suggests she dies in 1653, when her last letter is written. Has anyone read the biography Insubordinate Spirit?--DiamondRemley39 (talk) 15:57, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

After examining Insubordinate Spirit by Missy Wolfe, I am of the opinion that Fones' death took place 1668-1674. Her last transaction takes place in 1668; her husband remarries in 1674. I have added information to the article. Perhaps there is some better phrasing for the lead and the infobox than "c. 1673". --DiamondRemley39 (talk) 17:19, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Elizabeth Fones. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121117040932/http://www.friendsofgreenwichpoint.org/page2.php to http://www.friendsofgreenwichpoint.org/page2.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:45, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]