Talk:Elite Player Performance Plan

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Elite Player Performance Plan article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 23 November 2011 by reviewer Hallows AG (talk · contribs).

Football: England Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	English football portal This article is supported by the English football task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Can anyone confirm / deny this

Re. un-referenced edit by 90.196.57.213 on 24/07/12 - added Yeovil and Hereford to the drop-out list.
I have found this link which I assume is the source of this: http://www.swindonadvertiser.co.uk/sport/9832965.Wray_s_fear_over_Town_youngsters/
However I can't find anything on ytfc.net or herefordunited.co.uk to confirm this. Further http://www.ytfc.net/page/CofE/0,,10673~2757755,00.html and http://www.thisissomerset.co.uk/Yeovil-Town-announce-plans-youth-development/story-16486062-detail/story.html appears to indicate that Yeovil town is continuing an academy but without the EPPP.
Can anyone find any better information on this?
Lukew151 (talk) 08:44, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Alphabetical order for team lists

For readability, I have re-ordered the team lists so they are now in alphabetical order, and made them all links to their respective articles. I feel that this increases the quality of the table.

Also, I have renamed some teams to their full name (e.g. Luton to Luton Town, Peterborough to Peterborough United). For now, I have kept the A.F.C. prefixes for Bournemouth and Wimbledon, but have ordered them alphabetically without the prefixes. If anyone has an opinion on what to do with these names, please feel free to add them here.

If anyone has any teams to add, I think we ought to follow these guidelines:

use the full name of teams, without the F.C. or A.F.C. suffix
make the team name link to its respective article
put the team name in alphabetical order within the list, ignoring the A.F.C. prefixes of Bournemouth and Wimbledon

Andrew (talk) 13:28, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Elite Player Performance Plan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:45, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]