Talk:Elinor Mavor
Appearance
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF THE GRAPHICS
[edit]This strike me as subjective opinion. While I feel the graphics of Fantastic and Amazing were of high quality towards the end of her tenure, I felt that they were of equal quality at the end of Ted White's tenure as editor and that they actually dipped in quality at the beginning of Elinor's tenure (and that's not even counting the ridiculously cramped typesetting). Or, alternatively, if we're just talking about improvements during Elinor's own tenure, the quality of the stories also improved in my opinion, so referring to just the art renders that a glaring ommission. Of course my opinion is subjective as well, but I think I make my point. 211.26.193.92 (talk) 05:58, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
- I'll have to check but I'm pretty sure the opinion comes from Ashley's history, cited in the article. Do you have a historical source that agrees with your comments that we could use to balance Ashley's opinions? Mike Christie (talk) 13:00, 25 May 2010 (UTC)