Talk:Elie Tahari

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Fashion Stub‑class Mid‑importance

	Fashion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is not of netral tone and has unverifiable content.

Someone needs to edit this page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.161.112.110 (talk) 20:42, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I added {{pov}} to the article, but I suggest you to replace it by {{lopsided}} in the specific biased sentences, so the article can be more easily fixed. Waldir ^talk 23:18, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, the whole thing looks like it's pretty much copied wholesale from a press release. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.152.239.217 (talk) 17:26, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Then a ~~{{pov}}~~ {{advert}} box at the top of it is the right markup. I won't work on this article since I have other ongoing projects, but hopefully someone will drop in and correct the tone of the article. At least, till then, people who read it will be warned of its un-neutral approach. Waldir ^talk 18:54, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just removed the {{advert}} tag, thanks to the work of several editors (see history). Waldir ^talk 19:28, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There are still sourcing issues with this article. I've removed the most blatant POV and peacock statements, as well as a quote that was unreferenced. Hopefully this edit will allow interested editors to build up the article with the addition of reliably sourced and neutral information. Cheers, --ponyo (talk) 16:08, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Only referenced material on article just got trashed

The only referenced item on this article just got trashed in this edit. Previously there was no mention of his personal life, his wife, or his fabulous lifestyle. This is all the more amazing because not a single other item in this article is referenced.Americasroof (talk) 17:07, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You appear to have taken my edit personally. Part of working in a collaborative environment is that edits can be reverted or updated, which I have done here. I have no qualms with discussing why I made the changes I did.

First change:removing the age difference between the couple. This information is trivial and of a gossipy nature. It was also irrelevant to the information that followed.
Second change:removal of the listings and prices. Per WP:NOTNEWS the critical information is that Tahari has put property up for sale (and even this is a stretch). What lasting notability does this information impart? The prices should certainly not be included as real estate prices fluctuate constantly. If an argument was made that the properties and pricing should be included, then only the final selling price should be included as it is absolute - it will not fluctuate.

Your argument that it is the only source in the article is irrelevant, regardless of how many sources an article has, each addition of information and corresponding reference should be compliant with policy and guidelines when possible. Simply being the only reference does not merit being able to include whatever you want; it still needs to be relevant. The New York Post article used as a reference is written in a very gossipy tone as well, ("we hear that", "there are whispers", "they seem ready" etc), so it's best to stick to the facts when using it. As it stands now the information is neutral and referenced. When the dust settles follow-up information can be added as to how it all turns out. The edits I made where in no way an attack on what you added, it simply condensed the information in a way to avoid WP:NOTNEWS. Jezebel'sPonyo ^shhh 18:12, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Elie Tahari. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160310070130/http://www.neco.org/medal-of-honor/medalists-search/tag/t to http://www.neco.org/medal-of-honor/medalists-search/tag/t

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:34, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]