Talk:Elevator Gallery

	museums portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

This gallery deserves mention in an academic article. it is a culturally significant part of the east london art scene, with metions and reviews in art magazines and papers. I have referenced some of these within the article. art review, and timeout.

Artreview, however, is a social website; it is not reliable. Does this gallery have any coverage in reliable publications? —C.Fred (talk) 04:02, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have given a reference from Time Out Magazine, in which it featured as part of a special issue exploring the art culture of E9 area london. Zcwcd49 (talk) 04:07, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have clarified that reference as being the 19-25 June issue 2008.Zcwcd49 (talk) 04:07, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This article is not non-trivial coverage of the Elevator Gallery. To establish notability you need to show non-trivial coverage in reliable sources A new name 2008 (talk) 04:10, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that fuller coverage needs to be shown. However, I'll grant that enough is asserted about the gallery to exempt it from speedy deletion. It is still subject to the normal deletion discussion process, though. —C.Fred (talk) 04:14, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Its has shown notable artists. The Birthday party included Mark McGowan, the performance artist http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_McGowan_(performance_artist), and the coming show includes Tim Head, who has had solo shows in Whitechapel Art Gallery, the Serpentine and the ICA, and who has work in public collections, such as the V&A, and the Tate. http://www.ucl.ac.uk/slade/timhead/fullbiog.htm#solo http://www.firstthursdays.co.uk/content.php?page_id=1735 Zcwcd49 (talk) 04:26, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ill get back in touch later. im going to bed. nighty nigtht. Zcwcd49 (talk) 04:30, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Still not sure why Time Out is not seen by ALL as a suitable source of reference. It is a major publication after all.--Amedeo Felix (talk) 11:55, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well if mention in an Artists Newletter review of a show isn't important enough I'm damned if I know what it, because that is one of teh most important art publications in existence. I have also added links to Time Out articles. If this page gets deleted I would say that was most unjust.--Amedeo Felix (talk) 12:00, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Elevator Gallery. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:37, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]