Talk:Eleutherodactylus

	Eleutherodactylus is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for amphibians and reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Size

While previewing this article, the following message was appended:

This page is 40 kilobytes long. This may be longer than is preferable; see Wikipedia:Article size

Any ideas on how to resolve this issue would be greatly appreciated. Folajimi 14:30, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

article size

You could drop the species list and link to "Amphibian species of the world at AMNH."Pstevendactylus 15:02, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just keep it as it is. Considering it is the largest vertebrate genus, it needs special consideration. --liquidGhoul 10:29, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of ditching the list, how about having a separate page for the list? Hopefully, that will satisfy the article size recommendation. --Folajimi 00:35, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There is no need to change it. The article size rule isn't set in concrete, it is just a reccomendation. As this is an extraordinary article (largest vertebrate genus) special considerations need to be used. If the article, which excludes the taxonomy section, gets larger, it may be good to do what Folajimi suggested, but in the article's current state, I don't see a reason. --liquidGhoul 00:52, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Moving the species list to another page will just make the list on that page over the limit. Since there's so little text here, I don't see the point of that. Separating Craugastor to a separate page would reduce the list by 100 species or so.Pstevendactylus 01:53, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Shall I tag this article for cleanup per liquidGhoul's response? --Folajimi 14:12, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The list should be appendicised as a separate article. Bendž|Ť 13:36, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Subgenera

I'm currently reorganising a lot of species into the four subgenera described in Heinicke, M.P., W.E. Duellman & S.B. Hedges (2007). "Major Caribbean and Central American frog faunas originated by ancient oceanic dispersal". Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 104 (24): 10092-7. DOI:10.1073/pnas.0611051104 . Also, I'm removing parentheses around the authorities as these should only be used for older authorities when followed by a subsequent authority. Bendž|Ť 11:04, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See Hedges, S. B., W. E. Duellman, and M. P. Heinicke. 2008. New World direct-developing frogs (Anura: Terrarana): molecular phylogeny, classification, biogeography, and conservation. Zootaxa 1737:1–182 for a partition of the genus in four families and many new genera and subgenera —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.114.62.239 (talk) 22:43, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What's the status of the reorganization? --Ljvillanueva (talk) 23:50, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reorganization of Genus following Hedges et al 2008

I'm starting a reorganization of the Eleutherodactylus genus. I'll try to also fix the other genus, Craugastor and Pristimantis, for example.

The main source is:

Hedges, S. B., W. E. Duellman, and M. P. Heinicke . 2008. New World direct-developing frogs (Anura: Terrarana): molecular phylogeny, classification, biogeography, and conservation. Zootaxa 1737: 1-182.

Please feel free to point out errors, conflicts or changes that are needed.Ljvillanueva (talk) 21:44, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Eleutherodactylus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070925082946/http://www.cfrar.com/amphibianfacts.htm to http://www.cfrar.com/amphibianfacts.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:49, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]