Jump to content

Talk:Electronic waste in the United States

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 24 August 2020 and 16 October 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Isaac Mills, Qw3458jm. Peer reviewers: Jakefriend9.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 20:36, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 29 March 2021 and 4 June 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Naavelaz, JosephAngleUCSC.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 20:36, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

[edit]

There is no data on exports - the US definitely does not keep all of its electronic waste inside its borders. Also, what are different types of facilities/organizations that break down electronic waste?

I am interested in the breakdown of how the US manages its E-waste: is there a coherent data set available to analyze the proportions? CarlesPuyol5 (talk) 23:26, 3 March 2017 (UTC)CarlesPuyol5[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Teresayu1, Mcnelson510.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 20:24, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

[edit]

The first citation links to a password protected site https://blackboard.unc.edu/webapps/portal/frameset.jsp?tab_id=_2_1&url=%2fwebapps%2fblackboard%2fexecute%2flauncher%3ftype%3dCourse%26id%3d_321396_1%26url%3d How can we even be sure it exists? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.43.27.98 (talk) 03:20, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Request Edit

[edit]

I have a WP:COI with NextWorth Solutions, an electronics trade-in service, which is currently going through a "Good Article" review, however it cannot meet the GA criteria without addressing the Orphan tag. It's possible it shouldn't be de-orphaned, however one possibility I mentioned was adding something to this article under the Reuse section along the lines of: "Gazelle and NextWorth are the two largest electronics buy-back websites" (or something)

The sources are:

  • "Gazelle and Nextworth are two of the biggest reselling portals" New York Daily News
  • "NextWorth and Gazelle. The best-known of the buy-back sites" MarketWatch

I notice there are currently many other services mentioned in this section without sources, however I can't say for sure whether any of them should be, including NextWorth, so I defer to another editor. Thanks much. CorporateM (Talk) 15:10, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't even see this message beforehand, but coincidentally I added links to NextWorth and Gazelle. I'll take a look at the rest of your request. Edge3 (talk) 16:30, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Revised. What do you think? Edge3 (talk) 03:02, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The reference to Cadmium in CRT phosphors is spurious. The only example of cadmium phosphorous I have seen was from a 1960s US Navy submarine. Cadmium was used in very, very, very early color CRTs to create reds and yellows (see CRT article on wikipedia). When Japan manufacturers created barium panel glass (which blocks radiation like leaded glass, but is more transparent), cadmium was discontinued, according to an interview I had with a retired San Diego CRT engineering professor 20 years ago. Given the prominence of cadmium in the article, and the gravity of the charge, this must be researched and anyone making the claim about cadmium may have to be questioned for objectivity./ Retroworks (talk) 00:26, 30 November 2018 (UTC)Robin Ingenthron[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Electronic waste in the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:58, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 11 external links on Electronic waste in the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:25, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback - GSI

[edit]

Great article! Very thorough additions with relevant coverage! Continue to write about how this topic is relevant!GAA8423 (talk) 21:04, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Good Article. Good use of different credible sources. Could make the introduction paragraph more encompassing of the whole article. But good article. Fluffybunny55 (talk) 20:27, 17 April 2017 (UTC)FluffyBunny55 April 17 1:20pm[reply]

See my complaint about unsupported references to cadmium in CRT phosphors - my research indicates the original source was a US Navy submarine CRT in the 1960s. My understanding is that cadmium phosphors were eliminated in USA, Western Europe, and Japan by the early 1970s.Retroworks (talk) 00:31, 30 November 2018 (UTC)Robin Ingenthron[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on Electronic waste in the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:41, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

The article has had a section "Consumer recycling." I changed the section name to add the words "and disposal" and I added a one-sentence paragraph following the words "convenient recycler or refurbisher." Recyclers and refurbishers are frequently not convenient. This allowed me to start a new subsection on e-waste as a form of household hazardous waste, which I have done.

I live in California. California has an Electronic Waste Recycling Fee but that does not cover many common types of e-waste.

This is bold editing on my part. I hope the new subsection will be improved by others, and I may make some improvements myself. Oaklandguy (talk) 19:45, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Is bitcoin ewaste a significant problem please?

[edit]

See also discussion at Talk:Environmental impact of bitcoin Chidgk1 (talk) 16:49, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Electronic_waste_in_the_United_States&oldid=1196696911"