Talk:Electronic centralised aircraft monitor

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Introduction could clarify if ECAM is proprietary and only available from Airbus

Introduction (makes ECAM sound like a generic facility) and could/should clarify if ECAM is proprietary and only available from Airbus. Are ECAM and EICAS the only electronic crew alerting systems ? - Rod57 (talk) 16:29, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]