Talk:Electronic article

This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Resource Exchange

If you have access to this resource, or if you need to verify a citation from this reference, check out WikiProject Resource Exchange.Resource ExchangeWikipedia:WikiProject Resource ExchangeTemplate:WikiProject Resource ExchangeResource Exchange articles

Computing

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
	This redirect has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Academic Journals

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal articles
See WikiProject Academic Journals' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

This article was nominated for deletion on 25 November 2006. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Untitled

Restored content, because the redirect wasn't specific enough. I propose to let this article remain as a stub, but perhaps a central linking point as ths group of articles develop. DGG 06:27, 11 October 2006 (UTC) Why was it replaced by a category with nothing in it?. Restored content. Will add more. If you want to remove articles, propose them for deletion in the proper manner, so it can be discussed.[reply]

list of services

I think that list of major services was by no means spam links, was fairly well under control, and could usefully be expanded. could you defend their removal? The Iowa page is perhaps not a very clear alternative. Maybe w can find a better.DGG (talk) 07:50, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]