Talk:Herrenwyk power station

This article was nominated for deletion on 5 September 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Speedy deletion

This article was created by moving information from the Lübeck-Herrenwyk article. It was the only section of above-mentioned article and even longer than rest of the article. Based on this, it seems that it may be the most significant thing in the Lübeck-Herrenwyk. Also, separation helped to make more logical categorization. However, the overall notability may be questionable. I try to find more information and fix it. In case, this article will be deleted, this information should be restored in some way in the Lübeck-Herrenwyk article.Beagel (talk) 06:14, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are going to have to show that this topic is notable and it meets WP:N, WP:RS and WP:V. Given that I have not seen similar articles, I think this will be difficult to do. Your best bet may be to merge the information back into the main article. If the categorization is the issue, you can change this to a redirect and add the categories on the redirect. I know some editors don't like that but it is allowed and really helps in many cases. Vegaswikian (talk) 06:31, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Decline CSD suggest going through AFD since its content from another article give the editors time to adress notability Gnan garra 15:04, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]