Jump to content

Talk:Electric Company (football)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:47, 9 August 2010 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria[reply]

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    Don't forget to capitalize Electric Company every time you use it.
    O.K. fixed.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 17:13, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Still needs a light copy-edit. Forex Tackle doesn't need to be capitalized.
    Some awkward tags that need to be worked on.
    I have removed two tags that I am fairly certain are resolved. I have also tweaked the other two, but they await your removal.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 20:03, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Most of these still remain to be addressed.
    B. MoS compliance:
    Capitalization issues in refs.
    Fixed.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 17:17, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    What position did Jarvis play? Interesting that there were only three Pro Bowlers on the unit.
    Center.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 17:19, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Electric_Company_(football)/GA1&oldid=378659994"