Talk:Electric Chapel

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Electric Chapel article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Electric Chapel has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
August 31, 2016	Good article nominee	Listed

Electronic music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lady Gaga Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lady Gaga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lady Gaga on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Lady GagaWikipedia:WikiProject Lady GagaTemplate:WikiProject Lady GagaLady Gaga articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rock music Low‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Women in Music

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Electric Chapel Reviews

I found several mentions of Electric Chapel in reviews of 'Born This Way', that should be used within the Critical Reception section.

NME gave it a positive review, stating "Elsewhere the sci-fi goth night-stalk ‘Electric Chapel’ perhaps nails the record’s blood-and-chrome aesthetics most effectively of all." Their review is here: http://www.nme.com/reviews/lady-gaga/12061

Spin also offers a positive review, stating ""Electric Chapel" pairs divine diva thump with a Van Halen guitar solo". The review here: http://www.spin.com/#reviews/lady-gaga-born-way-streamlinekonliveinterscope

BeatsPerMinute.com had this to sav. " “Electric Chapel” sees Gaga fusing metal riffs with electronic beats – think Iron Maiden meets 80s pop. These kind of changes in sound are what make Born This Way so much more interesting than her debut The Fame – which for the most part, played it safe." Another positive review that can be found here: http://beatsperminute.com/reviews/album-review-lady-gaga-born-this-way/

So that's three positive reviews, which would also likely swich the overall Critical Reception from 'mixed' to 'positive' also.--217.43.77.174 (talk) 12:56, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I added the NME and Spin sources to the reception section. BeatsPerMinute seemed more appropriate under composition, so that's where I placed it. I think the first line of "Critical Reception" should stay at "mixed" since the two reviews you posted only mention "Electric Chapel" in passing, while the other sources give in-depth appraisals of the song. Calling the reviews "mostly positive" would be unjust and untrue. --Thevampireashlee (talk) 14:56, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Electric Chapel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120503055340/http://www.koreatimes.co.kr:80/www/news/art/2012/04/143_109924.html to http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/art/2012/04/143_109924.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:46, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]