Talk:Election surprise

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Table vs. List

What do you think? I like the idea of throwing the List of election surprises into a table, however I don't think it would be too readable, considering how lengthy some of the data are. samwaltz 23:19, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The October Surprise page is very similar in content, but reads much better. It is separated in subtopics by the election in question. In my opinion, these two topics appear to able to merge and redirect. CodeCarpenter 17:41, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category?

I would like to turn election surprise into a category, that we could toss onto 11 March 2004 Madrid train bombings, Mark Foley scandal, Trial of Saddam Hussein, etc. samwaltz 23:24, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

proposed merger

Please make all comments on the current proposed merger in this merge target's talk page JayKeaton (talk) 07:52, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]