This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Elbert S. McCuskey article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
After initially writing the article, and then thoroughly rewriting it twice after being rejected, I basically give up on it. I tried to write and rewrite it in the most natural way possible and used several well established and respected history sources, and yet the reviewers were unsatisfied. I have no idea what is going on, since I feel that the article is no different than countless of other accepted articles about specific persons, and since I feel that the reviewers are probably not even familiar with the given history topic to have an expertise to judge the content itself. Path-x21 (talk) 08:32, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg)
