Talk:El Kondor pada
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Hold the deletion. This article establishes notability, unlike the previous one. There is also no copyvio in it. --dcabrilo 01:26, 8 May 2006 (UTC) Also, not a repost, a brand new article. --dcabrilo 01:27, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
There is no reason to delete this article as it is now. It establishes notability, and provides verifyable information about the song. Zocky | picture popups 01:31, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
- The article establishes notability, but gives no references from where to check. It can be AFD at any time, unless references are given. -- ReyBrujo 08:07, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
- It certainly provides references for checking. It includes the name of authors, when and where it was recorded and on which record it appears. All those are easily verifiable. Zocky | picture popups 11:57, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
- The article is in better shape than the previous one, but still lacks a resource stating the band is notable and that the song is notable. Nowhere in the link it is stated that those are greatest hits during NATO agression, it is POV from the editor. -- ReyBrujo 12:57, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
- First of all, there is no "band", it's a theater group. Second of all, we still need the article for Indexovo radio pozorište, which can reference notability by, I don't know, digging out info on how many CDs they sold, how many listeners their radio show had, how many people saw their plays, etc. but as you can imagine, that's a rather tedious work for volunteers here :) --dcabrilo 17:20, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
- The article is in better shape than the previous one, but still lacks a resource stating the band is notable and that the song is notable. Nowhere in the link it is stated that those are greatest hits during NATO agression, it is POV from the editor. -- ReyBrujo 12:57, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
IF ANYONE TRY TO DELETE THIS SONG,THEN HE SHOULD BE BLOCKED. THIS IS ONE ARTICLE I STARTED AND ONLY I SHOULD BE ABLE TO DELETE IT,BECAUSE IT IS 100 PRECENT WIKIPEDIA-ARTICLE(THOUGH IT WAS CHANGED A LITTLE BIT SINCE I STARTED IT.)Dzoni 12:34, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
- You are nobody to decide who can and cannot delete the article. Your contributions are under the GFDL license, meaning you can't claim ownership of the article. -- ReyBrujo 12:57, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
- Well,at least I know that you are nobody to delete it,so its goodDzoni 12:58, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
- Dzoni, I think you are wrong. There are policies about when an article can be deleted, that you created it is not that relevant - you dont own the article by creating it. But if it is a good subject, article will stay, as there are other people who will edit the article and will not let it dissapear. And by the wikipedia policies, the article has its place here, so dont worry, be polite and everything will be fine, since rules protect the articles from the arbitrary deletions no matter who wrote them, as long as there are people who care - and edits of people like Zocky and many other show that indeed this is a subject many people care about. BabaRera 13:17, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
- I must also state that any Wikipedia editor can put this article into AFD, and there are no rules against that. During the AFD process (which is not a votation), it is determined if the article must be deleted or can stay. So, if anyone submits this to AFD, please read his reasons, and try to counter it with good objections. As you recently saw, being the one side with the most votes, shouting, insulting or giving dubious sources are not a way of probing your point. -- ReyBrujo 13:31, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
- Dzoni, I think you are wrong. There are policies about when an article can be deleted, that you created it is not that relevant - you dont own the article by creating it. But if it is a good subject, article will stay, as there are other people who will edit the article and will not let it dissapear. And by the wikipedia policies, the article has its place here, so dont worry, be polite and everything will be fine, since rules protect the articles from the arbitrary deletions no matter who wrote them, as long as there are people who care - and edits of people like Zocky and many other show that indeed this is a subject many people care about. BabaRera 13:17, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
- Well,at least I know that you are nobody to delete it,so its goodDzoni 12:58, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
Note WP:CITE and WP:OR. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 08:14, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
- Related to what exactly? Zocky | picture popups 20:38, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
The article reminds me another song about pilot of Phantom. The song was very popular in Soviet Uinion after Vietnam aggression. The plot : american pilot was shot down by chinese interceptor. -Vizhu v nebe beluyu chertu -Moy Fantom teryaet vysotu... and so on Sea diver 00:34, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
AFD result
[edit]This article was nominated for deletion on 8 May 2006. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
Now its final
[edit]Even though I was blocked for a few days,article that i started is finaly here to stay.I want to thank everyone for the support again and also I would like to point out that I recived an official apology from Wikipedia for blocking me.You can see it on my talk page.God bless you all long live the Srbija and the article that I started(this one).Watch out for more great article by Dzoni......coming soon....And they will be even better then this one!!!!Dzoni 18:49, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
- I almost feel bad for responding since you are blocked indefinantly, but you didn't start this article (in fact, you do not have a single contribution in the history of this article). DGX 19:12, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
- He started Pilot_of_invisible_F-117-a(song) which became this article after the first deletion. The former article was basically the song lyrics in English. It was rewritten into its current form mostly by Dcabrilo. AnonEMouse (squeak) 19:38, 25 May 2006 (UTC)