Talk:Ekstraklasa

Poland Low‑importance

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Football Mid‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sports

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sports, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sport-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SportsWikipedia:WikiProject SportsTemplate:WikiProject Sportssports articles

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
Requested articles (Sports)
Requested articles (Association football)
Requested articles (Association football women)
Requested articles (Motor sports)
Requested articles (Estonian sportspeople)
Assess : newly added and existing articles, maybe nominate some good B-class articles for GA; independently assess some as A-class, regardless of GA status.
Cleanup :
* Sport governing body (this should-be-major article is in a shameful state)
* Field hockey (History section needs sources and accurate information - very vague at the moment.)
* Standardize Category:American college sports infobox templates to use same font size and spacing.
* Sport in the United Kingdom - the Popularity section is incorrect and unsourced. Reliable data is required.
* Fix project template and/or "to do list" Current version causes tables of content to be hidden unless/until reader chooses "show."
Expand : Professional sports (crucial article explaining the salaried undertaking of sports)
* Sport industry (currently a sub-stub)
Photo : for pages listed in Category:Wikipedia requested images of sports and games and sub-categories.
Stubs : work on articles in Category:Sports stubs
Update : List of world sports championships
Other :
- Translate the page of sport in each country from corresponding article in other language Wikipedia to English Wikipedia which was marked in red.
- Categorize: Gather all (major/olympic) sports to be part of this project
- RfCs: answer requests for comment

Fair use rationale for Image:Pogon Lwow.png

Image:Pogon Lwow.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:32, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Cracovia.png

The image File:Cracovia.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

The following images also have this problem:

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --02:12, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to be doing some editing

I am making an effort to improve all Polish football related articles in the near future, and I am starting with this article. Expect some changes around here, one notable one that is already done is the beginning. I basically, want to see my countries articles as good as the likes of the Premier league and Bundesligga. (our level of football to, but that will take along time! :D)

If you guys pitch in a little that'd be great!

thelastone36 (talk) 03:32, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good job, I noticed one mistake, they listed champion in plural, we can't have TWO champions, as Wikipedia claim, besides Widzew doesn't even play in ekstraklasa, for folks not familiar with Polish league it's very misleading information, Lelek 1313 (talk) 23:38, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kadra1927.jpg Nominated for Deletion

	An image used in this article, File:Kadra1927.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Media without a source as of 29 June 2011 What should I do?
	A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:53, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Article outdated

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

The article needs to be updated as the most recent season ended today.

Please note the text in the template above, which reads "This template should be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, so that an editor unfamiliar with the subject matter could complete the requested edit immediately." --joe decker ^{talk to me} 04:48, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article contains general information, but also historical and statistical data about the highest Polish football league, the Ekstraklasa. The 2011/2012 season, the most recent one, ended yesterday and therefore the data provided in the article are outdated. That's why I'm requesting an edit to bring this article up to date again. -- Adriano 7 11:27, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, I'm pretty sure I just explained this. Let me try again.

I understand in general terms that that is what you would like. However, the template that you have used is used to attract the attention of random administrators to assist, not people who are specifically familiar with the topic. I'd have no idea where to start, and neither would most of the people you'll get in using this template.

If you would like to suggest a "complete and specific description of the request", that is, spelling out in every word and detail what change you'd like made, I (or another admin) will make it.

If you would simply like the article updated and aren't up to proposing the specific changes required, then say that here, but please don't use the {{Editprotected}} template until there is a proposed set of changes spelled out in every detail. It's not that we don't want to help, it's that we don't have enough information to help. Feel free to discuss this further at my talk page if you have further questions. Thanks! --joe decker ^{talk to me} 19:19, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, I believe the protection on this article is about to expire. You may find that you can make the changes directly by the time you read this. --joe decker ^{talk to me} 19:23, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't Polonia win the championship twice?

'46 and '00, why it is not listed then (and 1up for Masovia then) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.58.207.166 (talk) 03:30, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Champion, not champions

Widzew Lodz is not a champion, they don't even play in ekstraklasa, it's only ONE champion, not multiple champions, for season 17/18 Legia Warsaw is a champion, Lelek 1313 (talk) 23:20, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

1921 championship for Cracovia

Cracovia had won the 1921 championship. That's why it has a silver star (for 5 championships).

Discrepancy in number of titles for Wisła Kraków

Both Ekstraklasa#Clubs_by_number_of_league_championships and Wisła Kraków's own page state 13 titles, but the listing above (Ekstraklasa#List_of_league_champions), shows the club with 14. Grunners (talk) 20:34, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Similarly, Ruch Chorzów has the same discrepancy but in reverse (13 on List of League Champions, but 14 on Club by number of league championships and their own article. Grunners (talk) 20:39, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]