Talk:Ekman spiral

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Fluid Dynamics Taskforce.

scale

On what scale is the ideal Ekman Spiral formed? Is it ocean-wide (and thus a gyre, essentially)? Or is hurricane-sized, or tornado-sized, or what? I know that all sorts of conditions exist to prevent perfect Ekman Spirals from forming, but when they do occur, what size are they?165.91.64.254 (talk) 06:54, 23 September 2008 (UTC)RKH[reply]

Think there should be a definition or link for "pendulum day" used in article. —DIV (128.250.204.118 01:41, 19 March 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Ekman spiral and Ekman layer refer to somewhat different phenomena and should not be merged. --Drphysics 16:35, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

example

how do I add this image from wikitravel?

File:WikiTravel:Lake Burley Griffin.JPG

Visualisation of the Ekman spiral in wind near the ground, by the angle of falling water at different heights.

Cesiumfrog (talk) 05:10, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ekman Spiral diagram is incorrect

This diagram is incorrect. The Coriolis force (4) should always be at 90 degrees to the current (3) at each depth. Frictional forces are also required to complete the balance and avoid time-dependent flow. Lastly, the decay with depth should be exponential, not linear.131.236.42.180 (talk) 23:58, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ekman spiral. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:08, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Coriolis force is perpendicular to what?

I don't understand how the Coriolis force can be always perpendicular to the current direction. It seems to me that Coriolis is always perpendicular to the north-south axis (constant), not to the (variable) direction of the current. Could someone give more explanations about it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.86.104.115 (talk) 08:11, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mergeto Ekman layer

I just stuck a mergeto tag on this article; see Talk:Ekman layer for discussion. Both articles contain the same formulas, the same solution, similar diagrams, similar discussion. Both are inadequate, in that they fail to provide any physical intuition, beyond saying "oh its just Coriolis". 67.198.37.16 (talk) 19:26, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]