Jump to content

Talk:Einat Wilf

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Controversy about her marriage and personal views

[edit]

I propose to remove this section. It finds no mention on the Hebrew wikipedia (none that I could find), plus her marriage is mentioned in one line of text, without going too much into her personal life. On the contrary to what is stated here, it's made clear there that she's engaged in promoting international relations between the State of Israel and Jews living abroad. I have the feeling this controversy part is completely blown out of proportion. It doesn't smell like npov and sounds like someone is trying to push their (obviously religious) agenda -- which is not present at all on the Hebrew wikipedia. --Legalburst777 (talk) 00:43, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I believe it indeed is relevant, and she herself gave an interview about her intermarriage. See Einat Wilf Q&A — Preceding unsigned comment added by Qohelet1 (talk • contribs) 09:56, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Information about Einat Wilf being an agent was removed based on false reason

[edit]

I've came to the article from a polish website [1], where it is said Richard Gutjahr, filmed both terrorists attacks: in Nice and Munich. To add fuel to the fire, it mentions that his wife (E. Wilf) was a Mossad's agent and this information was quickly removed after the the latter terrorist attack.

I checked it out of curiosity and the reason behind removing that part of the article is: Fixed the mossad add from just after the terrorist attack in Munich. The are abusing it here http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message3241121/pg8#57929044

but we can clearly see that the Mossad part was in the first version of the article [2].

The user who deleted that part was anonymous. Is someone moderating anonymous edits and if so, who was it in this case? It may lead to some other edits that shouldn't happen.

If it's true that E. Wilf was an agent of Mossad, then this incident shows vulnerability of Wikipedia to share truth. If it wasn't then it shows how bad reasoning and timing behind edits can fuel conspiracy theories.

[1] http://joemonster.org/p/1544631/Ta_sama_osoba_filmowala_ataki_w_Nicei_i_Monachium [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Einat_Wilf&oldid=451859690 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Waetherman (talk • contribs) 08:05, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Einat Wilf. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:48, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Einat_Wilf&oldid=1257957356"