Talk:Eidsvoll Verk Station/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 14:52, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
- Starting review. Pyrotec (talk) 14:52, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
Overall Summary
[edit]GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
A fairly concise article on a modern railway station little more than ten years old.
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
I'm awarding this article GA. Congratulations, another one to add to your growing lists of GAs. Pyrotec (talk) 11:33, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you for sacrificing some of your time to review the article :) Arsenikk (talk) 12:33, 21 March 2010 (UTC)