This article was nominated for deletion on 2 September 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of heavy metal music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalWikipedia:WikiProject MetalTemplate:WikiProject MetalHeavy Metal articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Alright, I fixed up/added a few albums. When I get some more time I'm going to try to go a little more in-depth and bring all of the Eidolon-related articles up to par. WinterSteel (talk) 00:51, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The deletion debate was closed as keep due to number of reliable sources mentioning the band. Since most of those sources mention the band only in context with Megadeth, there is not enough text about Eidolon itself to cover a quality article. I think that merging is a logical choice. If we can't reach a consensus, I suggest moving the page to Article incubator in order to see if it can be improved, though I seriously doubt that. — NikFreak (leave message) 15:47, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Since no one is replying, I am beginning to assume that merging can be started tomorrow. If someone has an objection, this would be good time to explain your points of view. Otherwise, I will begin to merge the article with Megadeth in next 5 days. Regards. — NikFreak (leave message) 13:10, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No, the AfD already established that a separate article is warranted, as multiple criteria of WP:MUSIC are met. If you believe the closing admin was mistaken, you can take it up with them, or go to deletion review. I didn't participate in the AfD, but I think the closing admin was completely correct, for what it's worth. I've added several references to the article just now. Paul Erik(talk)(contribs)02:16, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, I have already talked to admin about that. In AfD discussion we agreed that the sources mentioning the band are reliable. However, everyone who voted for deletion also agreed that the sources mentioning the band in context with Megadeth aren't enough to make a standalone article. The closing admin said that there was only one way the deletion nomination could end (since even the ones who voted for deletion agreed that there are enough reliable sources to pass notability), but he also said that the merging can be done if necessary. As I can see, the only significant source is the Allmusic one. I believe that encyclopedia would be improved with such articles being merged with ones of greater importance. Since I am not the one to decide that on my own, I took it here for discussion. If we disregard notability criteria for a second, a stub of this quality shouldn't exist on Wikipedia on it's own. If someone wants to try and rewrite the article, taking informations from all the sources mentioned in AfD discussion, be my guest. But I do not believe that it can be done and I would like to start merging in 4 days. It is always possible to revert the edits and recreate this article if someone decides he can improve it to a decent quality. I definitely do not intend to leave the article the way it is now. I am offering one solution. If someone has a better idea, feel free to discuss about it here or take it to my talk page. — NikFreak (leave message) 13:31, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
