Talk:Ego Death (song)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: LOVI33 (talk · contribs) 14:41, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Per your request. Dance music is probably the genre that interests me the most so this should be fun to review! LOVI33 14:41, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Comments

Infobox and lead

• Infobox looks good!
• This article is about the house song → This article is about the Ty Dolla Sign song; or something along those lines

•  Done --K. Peake 07:03, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

• it expands on West's "Fade" → it expands on West's 2016 song "Fade"

•  Not done I noted the release year in the body so I don't think I need to here as well --K. Peake 07:03, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

• I'm kinda confused about what "the former" is in "Initially previewed after the Coachella Valley Music and Arts Festival in April 2019, the former experienced an internet leak in March 2020"

• Because "Fade" was referenced second in the previous sentence, I thought I would use the former to differentiate... or should it be the song instead, as I only use "it" previously? --K. Peake 07:03, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

• US Billboard Bubbling Under Hot 100 chart → US Bubbling Under Hot 100 chart, published by 'Billboard

•  Done --K. Peake 07:03, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Background and recording

• I've been told that Quoteboxes are discouraged in music-related articles. Perhaps a switch to the {{Quote}} template would be better.

• Are you sure this is correct since I've seen GAs like "Frail State of Mind" use quoteboxes, plus blockquote looks awkward at the beginning of a section? --K. Peake 07:03, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

• Prose looks amazing!

Composition and lyrics

• House music is a style Club (EDM). Are you sure it should be listed?
• to "Fade" by West → to "Fade" as it was mentioned above that it is by West

•  Done for the above --K. Peake 07:03, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Release and promotion

• The song later experienced a release to US → The song was later serviced to US

•  Done --K. Peake 07:03, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

References

• No copyright violations!
• All citations look good!

Verdict

• Overall, it is an amazingly well-written article. Only a few concerns so I will put this article  On hold for now. Defiantly GA quality. Good job! LOVI33 03:26, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

• LOVI33 Thanks a lot for the review over a short period of time, I have implemented most of the changes and left comments for you regarding the others. --K. Peake 07:03, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

• Great! ✓ Pass. LOVI33 14:41, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·