Talk:Eggenberg family

Every entry on this list needs a source. Reverting without placing a source is rather strongly against policy. Please, feel welcome in building a verifiable article but do so with reliable sources. Anything short of that is not on.Bali ultimate (talk) 22:43, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Article have four reliable sources. If you have problem, read WP:CITE: "Citations are usually presented within articles in one of five ways:

1. General reference: By placing the citation in a list at the end of an article."--Yopie (talk) 09:50, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Insufficient sourcing. In line is needed, for each claim. Another revert and i'll report you for edit warring and you will be blocked. Read wp:cite yourself, son: "The policy on sourcing is Wikipedia:Verifiability, which requires inline citations for any material challenged or likely to be challenged, and for all quotations." You genaology obsessives don't get a free pass, and with all hte hoaxsters scrabbling over these pages to invent fake royal lineages it's time to tighten standards up, at least waning readers this stuff is unverified.Bali ultimate (talk) 10:06, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]