Talk:Effects of Hurricane Mitch in Honduras/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: 1ST7 (talk · contribs) 03:38, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
I'll review this article. Initial comments will hopefully be posted soon. --1ST7 (talk) 03:38, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
Here's the review:
- Well-written
- "Prisoners in Tegucigalpa Central Penitentiary was evacuated to the national stadium" should be "Prisoners in Tegucigalpa Central Penitentiary were evacuated".
- Stupid grammar, fixed it. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:06, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- The article uses % in some places and "percent" in others. Please make this consistent.
- Fixed. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:06, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- "Prisoners in Tegucigalpa Central Penitentiary was evacuated to the national stadium" should be "Prisoners in Tegucigalpa Central Penitentiary were evacuated".
- Verifiable with no original research:
- Broad in its coverage:
- "Hurricane Mitch set back the economies of various countries in the region, after they had improved throughout the 1990s." Can you please name some of the other countries?
- Clarified. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:06, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- Please mention the casualties in the lead.
- It is at the end of the second paragraph. Do you want me to go into more detail? --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:06, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- You're right. Sorry, must have missed it. --1ST7 (talk) 01:00, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
- "Hurricane Mitch set back the economies of various countries in the region, after they had improved throughout the 1990s." Can you please name some of the other countries?
- Neutral:
- Stable:
- Illustrated, if possible, by images:
I'll put the article on hold for a week to give you time to address these things. Thanks for your work! --1ST7 (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot for the review, and for posting it to both of my accounts! I believe I got everything here. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:06, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- You're welcome! The article looks good to go now, so I'm going to pass it. Congratulations, and thanks again for your work! --1ST7 (talk) 01:00, 20 November 2013 (UTC)