This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
"It is spelt this way in both Who's Who and the London Gazette." No, it's not, it's sometimes spelt that way in the London Gazette, and usually not. The examples of "FitzRoy" in the LG ([1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]) outnumber the examples of "Fitzroy" ([18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29]), and as the latter are generally early on in his career or in more informal parts of the LG they can easily be dismissed as typographical errors. The LG, throughout its life, has often ignored mid-surname capitals, and I could find you dozens of examples from any family that consistently uses or used them (FitzRoy, FitzClarence, FitzGerald, FitzMaurice, etc.) where the LG has neglected to do so. Crucially, the vast majority of instances in the LG where FitzRoy's own statements, as Speaker, were quoted, he was named as, and signed as, "FitzRoy" rather than "Fitzroy". His surname is, after all, what he considered it to be, and no amount of typological inexactitudes can change that. He is no different in the fact that he's often referred to as "Fitzroy" to any other member of his family, and I'm going to remove the alternative spelling and note for that reason. Proteus(Talk)09:14, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If an alternative spelling was used commonly in any source (and Who's Who is a major source) then we should list it, whether it is incorrect or not, since it may be seen. It is ridiculous to allow pedantry to cancel out information. And as to the alternative spellings in the LG being "generally early on in his career or in more informal parts of the LG", the announcement of his appointment to the Privy Council uses the Fitzroy spelling! Hardly either early in his career or informal. -- Necrothesp10:14, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]