Talk:Education in Texas

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Top-importance).

Education Mid‑importance

	Education portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Before I forget

List of private schools in Texas Oldag07 (talk) 15:31, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Public education compared to other states?

I remember reading an article awhile back detailing issues with public school funding in Texas, as well as it grabbing the 36th ranking for it's quality of education compared to the other states. Should this be mentioned if I find the article? --MercZ (talk) 00:51, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Probably. Don't quickly take comparisons, however. They are often promoted by people with an axe to grind. At least check [1] where you can evaluate white children in Texas compared to white children in other states and minorities in Texas compared to minorities in other states. You might be surprised. Northern states do really well compared with southern states until this bias is removed. Then they don't always look so good. Having said that, Massachusetts looks good anyway. Mississippi looks bad anyway. So it's not 100% bias! Student7 (talk) 01:40, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect socioeconomic status also plays a role, e.g. poor insert race/color/national origin demographic here to the same in another state may hide money differences. If all the blue-skinned Texans are poor and all the blue-skinned people from New York are well-to-do, that will make it look like Texas treats its blue-skinned students poorly, and people may think Texas has something against blue-skinned people. This assumes that household socioeconomic status really does matter - I think that's a safe assumption. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 01:51, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In Florida the statistics were a pleasant surprise, catapulting the state from low to average or above average for both whites and blacks. Vermont was shocked when they went from the top of the heap to the middle! :) Student7 (talk) 21:18, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Digital Library

I think the stub Texas Digital Library can be merged with this article. --NDSteve10 (talk) 04:10, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

University of Houston

I don't know who added that but University of Houston is not a tier one university. It's tier two and it's rank is not published by USnews. The only two public tier one universities in TEXAS are university of Texas Austin and Texas A&M. Rice university is also a tier one private university. So overall Texas has 3 tier one universities. As for the 3 references that some one added to add University of Houston as top tier university, one of them is from university of Houston itself mentioning that they are taking steps towards becoming tier one. The other two references are Houston business journals who just wish that this is true!!! There are seven emerging universities in Texas and they are all at the same level. They are all taking steps towards becoming tier one like University of North Texas and University of Texas at Dallas. Here is some proof to my claim: http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/best-colleges/university-of-houston-3652 http://www.texastribune.org/texas-education/tier-one-universities/emerging-research-universities-tier-one-status/ http://lubbockonline.com/interact/blog-post/brittany-hoover/2012-01-12/texas-state-classified-emerging-research-university#.UBxiPU1mSZg http://www.webometrics.info/details.asp?univ=uh.edu&zoom_highlight=university+of+houston — Preceding unsigned comment added by CrasherZZZ (talk • contribs) 23:49, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Three of your sources do seem to support your claim, but the one that's specifically about US News rankings (the 1st one) doesn't mention "tier" at all, AFAICT. (I guess that's what you're saying in your first sentence?) That source does say UH is ranked 184 nationally ("2013 edition"), however, and according to Rankings of universities in the United States#U.S. News & World Report College and University rankings, "now all the schools ranked in the top three quartiles (ranked 1 to 194) are 'First Tier' Universities, and the bottom quartile—the schools in the bottom 25%—are now labeled 'Second Tier'." (Although this statement in the article is not cited.) So maybe the other sources are using the old, pre-2011 definition of "Tier One" and not the new one... - dcljr (talk) 00:53, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Carnegie Foundation's Research Classification

The Carnegie Foundation classifies the University of Houston as a Tier One research university.[2][3][4][5] This is the highest classficiation of research universities. The designation makes UH one of only three Tier One state research universities in Texas. The Carnegie Foundation's Tier One research classification is not the same thing as the "Tier 1" National University Rankings in U.S. News & World Report.

The text in the Education in Texas article asserts that Texas has three Tier One state research universities: The University of Texas at Austin, Texas A&M University, and the University of Houston. This statement is correct as the Carnegie Foundation classifies these three institutions in its highest category of research universities.

–RJN (talk) 20:04, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

U.S. News & World Report Ranking

No where in the text—at the time of the talk page posting—does the Education in Texas article asserts that the University of Houston is Tier 1 in the National University Rankings of U.S. News & World Report; howevever, it is now. The Carnegie Foundation's "Tier One" research classification is not the same thing as the "Tier 1" National University Rankings in U.S. News & World Report.

The U.S. News & World Report ranks the university No. 184 (Tier 1) in its National University Rankings, and is No. 103 among top public universities.[6][7] It was ranked Tier 2 in previous years, but is now Tier 1 in the latest rankings!

–RJN (talk) 20:04, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Conclusion

The University of Houston is a Carnegie-designated Tier One research university, and is now Tier 1 in the National University Rankings of U.S. News & World Report.

–RJN (talk) 20:04, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Number of students in the Divide Independent School District

According to the article of the Divide Independent School District, there are 26 students in the district while this article states half that number. Please address this problem using reliable sources. Thank you. The Average Wikipedian (talk) 10:27, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestions

I believe that there is an imbalance of information for primary and secondary education in comparison to Universities. More general information could be added about the number of students, demographics of students and current achievement levels. There is only a brief segment about Hispanics and non-Hispanics and needs more context about demographics at large. I also believe that more citing is necessary with the claims about the universities and Robin Hood Plan. Also, not all universities are listed and some are mislabeled. For example, Rice and Trinity are a private institutions, not public. Reillybrooks (talk) 00:49, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Education in Texas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:13, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Education in Texas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:16, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]