Talk:Education in Lower Dir District

Pakistan Low‑importance

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pakistani districts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistani districts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistani districts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pakistani districtsWikipedia:WikiProject Pakistani districtsTemplate:WikiProject Pakistani districtsPakistani districts articles

I agree this article contributes little to the subject of Education in Lower Dir, however, the Lower Dir article is very sparse and this article has a wealth of information on the demographics. There is one source, so the information should be spared and put into the Lower Dir article. Scarykitty 06:59, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I read it more carefully, and I am going to remove the prod tag. I added an unsourced tag. This is only original research if these results were in fact never published somewhere. At any rate, this mostly quotes from the census and gives a list of elementary schools. There are myriad American communities with such unsourced lists of schools that are awaiting sourcing. Given that this is far away Pakistan where English is not the first language, I think this article needs more time to improve. This is a district of nearly a million people, so equivalent to a large U.S. state. The information inside is not contained in the Lower Dir District article and may be useful. Sourcing is a problem here, but we can't be sure this is original research. Scarykitty 07:09, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]