Talk:Eduard Hellvig

July 2013

Let's get a few things straight, Eheditor:

• A light touch is often ideal when editing. This is a biography, not a CV; consequently, not all CV-style details will be important. Undergraduate and PhD degrees, yes. The kind of filling with which Romanian politicians love to inflate their credentials, not so much.
• In a similar vein, readers are probably not interested in the precise title Hellvig held at the polling firm, or the name of the firm, so long as it doesn't have an article of its own at Wikipedia. Same goes for committee names - in every biography of a Romanian politician, something like "Defense, Public Order and National Security Committee" gets trimmed to "defense committee". Stick to essentials.
• The infobox is not for listing every single position ever held. Legislative and ministerial office, as a rule.
• Readers do not need micro-paragraphs; they can handle a few sentences on end as long as the paragraph is coherent. And if a paragraph is broken up, it must include a citation at the end.
• If you'd checked Category:Romanian politicians, you would have seen no one is placed directly in that category, since everyone is fitted into subcategories. Hellvig fits into five political subcategories; there is no need at all for him to be in the main one.
• Please see WP:COI. You are either Hellvig himself or, more likely, one of his employees. That has implications for your editing here. - Biruitorul ^Talk 14:35, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

October 2013

Since User:Popescu ionica refused to reply to objections from Biruitorul and instead she just kept reverting to her version, I have temporarily protected the page. I don't support this or the other version and I will unprotect the page if any constructive discussion follows. bogdan (talk) 18:10, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

February 2014

I was a bit puzzled to see User:DerHexer remove references to Hellvig's run-in with the National Integrity Agency. Yes, the case has not reached a final verdict, but precisely what policy indicates that should be the threshold for mentioning legal issues? By that standard, this section should not exist - indeed, McDonnell is only facing charges that have not yet been adjudicated by a court, while the accusations against Hellvig were upheld by an appellate court ruling almost a year ago.

Any policy-based clarification would be appreciated. - Biruitorul ^Talk 19:47, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Eduard Hellvig. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130525045935/http://www.hellvig.ro/ to http://www.hellvig.ro/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:40, 5 January 2018 (UTC)