Talk:Edith's checkerspot

Insects Low‑importance

	Insects portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Insects, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of insects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InsectsWikipedia:WikiProject InsectsTemplate:WikiProject InsectsInsects articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lepidoptera Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lepidoptera, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of butterflies and moths on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LepidopteraWikipedia:WikiProject LepidopteraTemplate:WikiProject LepidopteraLepidoptera articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Behavioral Ecology class

This article was the subject of an educational assignment in Fall 2013. Further details were available on the "Education Program:Washington University in St. Louis/Behavioral Ecology (Fall 2013)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki.

I am a student at Washington University in St. Louis working on the behavior of Euphydryas editha, specifically focusing on its mating system. I will add more information throughout the semester. Wmhua (talk) 22:35, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The current article has good information, but it is very specific. I added a Description, Distribution, and Host Plants headings in order to increase the scope of the article. More general information should be added to make the article a more complete entry. Also I am interested in seeing the origin for its name along with its relationship with humans as far as being endangered. Maximilianzhang (talk) 23:24, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Great job on the addition! II added some wikilinks and fixed some grammatical mistakes. I substituted the scientific name with the common name all over the article. Overall I thought the article was well written. However, the language was too specialized for Wikipedia. It would be good to go over the article and substitute some of the specialized terms with simpler ones. Aliciacanas (talk) 18:44, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This article has a lot of information on mating behavior, but not much else. It may be helpful to add information on feeding behaviors, morphology at different stages, and elaborating on some of the headings added by the other peer reviewer. I fixed one or two grammatical errors, and moved reference link 12 out of the heading and into the section. I would also like to see the origin of the name, especially considering the common names of the subspecies are all variations of the species name. Thatgirlnamedsofa (talk) 02:17, 2 November 2013 (UTC)thatgirlnamedsofa[reply]

Suggestions to get to good article:
- More pictures more pictures! Possibly of eggs
- to the taxobox, add the IUCN redlist conservation status (especially since you talk about it later in the article)
- add a map of the range
- there are many more places you can add links
- clean up the language in the "Impact on humans" section, it's not quite science-y enough
- Distribution and Habitat sections are short enough that they can be lumped into one Distribution and habitat section
- Great job! Wenamy (talk) 07:45, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Updates

Nice job of making your article much more comprehensive! Some suggestions to get your article to/closer to good article status: I would suggest putting in a lead. It should summarize information in your article (meaning, no new information) and cover the major points. Here is the link for more information about the lead: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Lead_section. I think your article could use more pictures as well. I think the "Description" section could be titled "Morphology", and could have subheadings with the larvae, pupae, and adult morphology sections. Finally, I think adding a section on taxonomy could be very informative.

Ichooxu (talk) 22:55, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Edith's checkerspot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081120125006/http://tils-ttr.org/sc-nabn/CommonNames-Nymphs%202.html to http://tils-ttr.org/sc-nabn/CommonNames-Nymphs%202.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:34, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]